Who joins
Business sponsors, process owners, frontline users, data and technology teams, security and risk leads.
Redesign how work moves across people, data and systems. Start with an Agentic AI Process Transformation workshop, then build and operate workflows with clear human accountability.
Plan a process transformation workshopBring process owners, frontline users, technology and security teams together to examine one business workflow. Map the current work, question unnecessary steps, identify where AI can help, and define where people must stay in control.
Turn the workshop into a prioritised use case, a risk assessment and a scoped pilot. Connect approved data and systems, evaluate agent behaviour and validate the outcome with users before extending the workflow or its permissions.
Business sponsors, process owners, frontline users, data and technology teams, security and risk leads.
Choose one process and bring representative, approved examples. Identify system owners, sensitive data, decisions and actions that require human approval.
A current and proposed process map, a prioritised use case, data and integration requirements, safety boundaries and a pilot plan. Agree owners, baseline measures, testable acceptance criteria and how outputs and actions will be verified.
Validate one workflow with users, evaluate failure and misuse scenarios, then agree a controlled rollout and ongoing operations. Funding and production approval are separate decisions.
Map the current and proposed workflow, accountable owners, success measures and risks. Agree what to simplify, automate or keep with people.
Connect the approved data and systems for a document, knowledge or operational workflow. Validate it with the people doing the work.
Limit data and tool access, evaluate unreliable outputs and misuse, and require human approval for consequential actions.
Agree release gates, monitoring, audit records, exception handling and a way to pause or recover the workflow.
Extract and validate invoices or procurement documents; route low-confidence cases to a reviewer.
Bring together demand, purchasing and supplier information so teams can investigate exceptions and make better decisions.
Find answers across approved policies and procedures, with source references and permissions respected.
Protect systems and data. Evaluate how AI behaves and the consequences of its actions. Agree controls and evidence for the risks in each engagement.
Agree data access, allowed tools, spending limits and actions requiring human approval. Start with the minimum permissions needed.
Evaluate grounding, unreliable outputs, prompt injection and unsafe tool use against the workflow. Include fairness and harmful-output checks where relevant to the decisions involved.
Record important decisions, route exceptions to an owner, monitor behaviour and provide a way to pause actions and recover when something goes wrong.
We agree a baseline, target, measurement method and accountable reviewer, alongside security and safety acceptance criteria. These are measures to consider, not promised results.
Link factual AI outputs to approved source records where available, and flag missing or uncertain evidence for human review. Record tool actions, approvals and evaluation results; check cited sources because a citation alone does not prove correctness.
No. We start with the business task, data, risk and cost constraints. We compare suitable proprietary and open-weight models, including language quality and where they can run. Model changes must pass the workflow’s evaluation and human approval checks.
We assess the available APIs, permissions and integration constraints during discovery. The first pilot focuses on the systems needed for one useful workflow.
No. Where relevant, we can work with your AWS account team to explore suitable programs. Eligibility, scope and approval must be confirmed before any funding is assumed.