Define the controls
Agree permitted locations, data flows, administrator access, encryption keys and operational ownership. Include logs, backups, external dependencies and recovery.
Keep enterprise AI accountable, safe and under control. Define data and access boundaries, assess sovereign AI requirements and validate model choices with evidence.
Discuss governed AI adoptionBuying AI tools is easy. Giving people the right access, understanding usage and keeping spending within agreed limits takes deliberate design. We help enterprise and education teams define those controls and test them in a scoped environment.
Different tools expose different controls. Direct model APIs, managed coding subscriptions and shared learning environments cannot always be governed in the same way. We make those boundaries visible before recommending a solution.
Sovereign AI starts with control over where AI runs, who can access data and models, and how the service is operated. We turn your requirements into a deployment and governance plan that your team can verify.
Open-weight models provide downloadable model files under their licence terms. We help assess whether they fit your work and transition suitable applications from proprietary model APIs, while preserving quality, safety and reliability.
Agree permitted locations, data flows, administrator access, encryption keys and operational ownership. Include logs, backups, external dependencies and recovery.
Compare models on representative tasks and relevant languages. Check accuracy, safety, response time, licence terms and the full cost of hosting and operations.
Adapt prompts, retrieval and tool integrations. Pilot one workload, keep test results and require human approval before a staged rollout, with monitoring and rollback.
Open weights alone do not make a system sovereign. The deployment, access rules, licence terms and operating arrangements must meet your agreed requirements.
Map tools, users, data and policies. Where sovereignty matters, agree permitted locations, access, dependencies and operational control.
Scope identity, model permissions and a sandbox. Test a selected open-weight model or deployment option when it addresses the agreed need.
Prototype user or team usage reporting and budget enforcement where the selected platform supports it.
Provide evaluation results, control gaps, licence checks and operating requirements. For a model transition, include acceptance criteria, a staged rollout and rollback.
Give a class or cohort access to approved AI capabilities, with defined budgets and faculty visibility.
Connect approved tools to identity and usage policies, then help teams apply them to real work.
Explore isolation, approvals and evaluation controls before moving a new AI use case toward production.
Protect systems and data. Evaluate how AI behaves and the consequences of its actions. Agree controls and evidence for the risks in each engagement.
Define approved tools, data handling, accountable owners and risk-based approval gates with the enterprise security and risk teams.
Test identity, permissions, isolation, data leakage and model behaviour. Document coverage and limits for each platform.
Review access, usage and evaluation results as tools change. Define incident escalation and the conditions for restricting or stopping use.
We agree a baseline, target, measurement method and accountable reviewer, alongside security and safety acceptance criteria. These are measures to consider, not promised results.
Link policies to implemented controls, evaluation results and review decisions. Keep access and usage records with agreed retention and permissions, and make control gaps and unresolved risks visible.
This is a consulting and implementation offering. We scope the controls and build or adapt the solution to your requirements; we do not present a universal, off-the-shelf governance platform.
No. API-based tools and managed subscriptions expose different interfaces, usage data and enforcement options. We validate support for each tool during discovery.
No. Technical controls can support your governance requirements, but regulatory and organisational obligations need their own review and sign-off.
No. The right choice depends on the task, language, quality, safety and operating constraints. Open-weight does not automatically mean open-source or unrestricted use. We check each model’s licence and compare the evidence before recommending a change.